Regulatory alignment is the real test.
ISO 13485 is necessary but rarely sufficient. EU MDR technical documentation, FDA 510(k) or PMA, Indian MDR licensing, and MDSAP alignment are the regulatory tests the QMS has to pass.
Industry
For hospital groups, diagnostic chains, medical device manufacturers, and health-tech firms — certifications that support clinical outcomes and market access in parallel.
Healthcare spans two quite different certification worlds. Hospitals, diagnostic chains, and clinical service providers sit closer to ISO 9001 and, in some jurisdictions, accreditation schemes such as NABH in India or JCI internationally. Medical device manufacturers operate under ISO 13485 and regulatory regimes — EU MDR, US FDA QSR (transitioning to QMSR), India MDR 2017 — that are substantially stricter than ISO 9001.
Health-tech and digital health businesses often straddle both. A SaaS company whose product qualifies as software as a medical device needs ISO 13485, IEC 62304, potentially 82304-1, and regulatory market submissions — alongside the ISO 27001 and SOC 2 that their enterprise customers expect. We architect these together rather than running parallel programmes.
A QMS aligned to medical device regulations across EU, US, Canada, Japan, and India.
Learn moreEmbed a quality management system that customers, regulators, and auditors recognise on sight.
Learn moreInformation security management aligned to Annex A controls, ready for customer and regulator scrutiny.
Learn moreDirective selection, technical file preparation, testing liaison, and declaration of conformity.
Learn moreGMP programmes for pharma, nutraceutical, cosmetic, and food manufacturers — documented the way auditors want.
Learn moreTechnical and management requirements for testing and calibration laboratories seeking accreditation.
Learn moreISO 13485 is necessary but rarely sufficient. EU MDR technical documentation, FDA 510(k) or PMA, Indian MDR licensing, and MDSAP alignment are the regulatory tests the QMS has to pass.
ISO 14971 risk management runs through design, production, post-market surveillance, and vigilance reporting. Treating it as a design-phase exercise is a common and expensive mistake.
IEC 62304 governs software lifecycle processes; cybersecurity expectations (FDA, EU MDR) are rising. ISO 27001 cannot substitute for 62304 — and vice versa.
Clinical quality and commercial velocity compete in product launches. A QMS designed around the way the organisation actually operates — rather than around a template — reduces that friction considerably.
Hospitals that manufacture or significantly reprocess medical devices fall into ISO 13485 scope for those activities. Most hospitals do not — accreditation schemes (NABH in India, JCI internationally) plus ISO 9001 are the more common choice.
Possible, and occasionally the right answer. More commonly, running a single QMS to ISO 13485 discipline and covering ISO 9001 within it is cleaner. Dual-certificate status is straightforward once the 13485 system is in place.
ISO 27001 is the usual foundation. For EU market participation, the EU MDR cybersecurity expectations apply; for US, FDA's post-market cybersecurity guidance is increasingly enforced. We build both into the QMS from design-stage, not as bolt-ons.
Half an hour on the phone with a senior consultant who has worked with
Warning: Undefined array key "bifma" in /home/u571561899/domains/crescentqualitycertification.com/public_html/includes/industry-page.php on line 111
Warning: Trying to access array offset on value of type null in /home/u571561899/domains/crescentqualitycertification.com/public_html/includes/industry-page.php on line 111
organisations before.